Partial Quotient Algorithm: An Alternative Method for Long Division

GeekMom
Image: Xanthoxyl via Wikimedia Commons

My youngest son is a whiz at math – as long as he can figure out problems in his head. But his uncanny ability to make sense of numbers is lost when he looks at a formulaic math problem. When he was learning long division he could frequently calculate the answer in his head, but given a written problem he’d melt into an uncomprehending heap of frustration.

While I don’t remember actually learning the process of long division, I’ve been doing it so long that it’s second nature to me. Nothing I did or said could help my son make sense of the process of long division though, so I began asking around. Miranda at Nurtured by Love came to my rescue when she suggested that I introduce my son to a method called partial quotient algorithm. While it may sound daunting, partial quotient algorithm (or partial quotient division) is a method for dividing numbers that’s much more accessible than the familiar but more abstract long division. It took me a few tries to make sense of this new method (old dog, new tricks and all) but my son was able to grasp it with very little trouble. Bingo! It just took coming at it from a different angle to make the written numbers make sense to him.

Curious? Take a look:

Liked it? Take a second to support GeekDad and GeekMom on Patreon!

7 thoughts on “Partial Quotient Algorithm: An Alternative Method for Long Division

  1. Thank you! I am going to share this with the math support teacher and see if this will help her students 🙂

    I will also teach this to my advanced students because I think they will like it. We like to play with numbers and this will be fun 😉

  2. Nice videos, I would just like to propose one suggestion. Instead of jumping back down to 20 in the first case, you should split the gap (as close as you can, I would still round to the tens or hundreds depending). Example: You first tried 10, then 100. Your next check should be 50. This method helps you bound in your answer faster then simply stepping up one at a time. Especially in your example in the video. Just a suggestion.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *